Filed under Mobile

Who wins? The Optus ruling and time shifting content

Optus TVNowAn Australian Federal Court ruling last week means that Optus customers will be able to watch TV (including free to air AFL and NRL) virtually live – on a two-minute delay – a service for which Telstra believed it had bought exclusive rights. Telstra will, no doubt, appeal the decision but given football seasons are about to kick off the consumer will win in season 2012.

The AFL and NRL will complain that the Optus TV Now service will devalue the Telstra rights deal and, in turn, have a negative effect on fans and clubs. The reality is that TV Now allows users to time shift content (remember the VCR?). More people will be exposed to the free to air advertising via TV Now which is a good thing for clubs and the AFL.

Today Gideon Haigh beautifully summarised the outcome on ABC’s Offsiders:

“It demonstrates how in hoc sport has become in television. Sport has borrowed against its future so extensively in the expectation of unending TV riches. The minute that TV sneezes – sport catches a cold. All those pampered players, all those self important suits, all those spoils, all those lifestyles and one judge can make them tremble…just for a moment we should enjoy their discomforture.”

Now I don’t think ‘discomforture’ is even a word but you get the point.

The biggest winner in the ordeal is Optus. The publicity for the virtually unknown service weeks before pre-season competitions begin is priceless.

The freedom for users to digitally record and ‘time shift’ content should never be taken away. Digital rights deals should be done annually so they can stay relevant to the ever advancing technology.

Finally, the AFL should look to the NBA which sells multiplatform ‘League Passes‘ globally around the world. Users can watch every game, from any device, at anytime with DVR controls. If it’s not careful, the AFL will alienate users and lose them to alternative ‘streams’ void of an archaic digital business model.

Related articles

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

The mobile zeitgeist and Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

tom cruise with mobile

This latest Hollywood Christmas blockbuster, Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol, is a fantastic example of how mobile is well and truly part of today’s zeitgeist. The film features several mobile screens in both its mise-en-scene and plot. IMF look to have a preference for Apple products with MacBooks, iPhones and iPads featuring regularly.

In one scene an elaborate contraption formed largely around an iPad projects a fake wall that’s used to break into the Kremlin. In arguably the most gripping scene, Tom Cruise chases a bad guy through a Dubai sandstorm using his mobile (I think a Galaxy Nexus) to locate his roving nemesis.

You always expect a film like Mission Impossible to have high tech gadgets. Q has been helping out 007 since 1962. But it’s the dominance in Ghost Protocol that represents something special.

Films often project and amplify current trends and it’s clear that Hollywood sees the mobile channel as one that symbolises technology, cool and…espionage.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Financial TImes launches new HTML5 mobile site

Financial Times mobile site

One of the world’s leading business news organisations, The Financial Times, has just launched a HTML5 iPhone and iPad optimised mobile site.

Although it crashed on initial load the interface and UX are impressive. You can even increase your devices ‘app’ capacity to 50mb to allow for offline reading.

It’s interesting that the FT are still calling it an app even though it’s basically just an iDevice optimised site.

Annoyingly you need to subscribe for a year to read anything more than headlines. That’s $370 a year. Petty cash for those financial types that spend this kind of money on piccolos. Unlike the FT website, there is no free registration that allows you to view 10 articles every month.

Tagged , , , , ,

Mobile multitasking and the future of TV

Guy with mobile in bed

Mashable recently reported on the increase of people multitasking with their mobile devices. My iPhone addiction combined with my Gen Y short attention span has resulted in me constantly multitasking. Weather, news, social feeds and email are all updated and checked several times throughout the day.

In a recent Yahoo and Razorfish poll of 2,000 Yanks, 94% engaged in some form of mobile communication while watching TV. Reality, News, Comedy and Sport are the most attractive to multitaskers with ad time becoming their mobile prime time. Mobile traffic also spikes during breaks in sporting events; Yahoo Sports saw a 305% increase during the last Super Bowl halftime show.

Bottom line: TV Advertising is stuffed.

Result: TV channels (not content) will die.

Musings: Here are some of my crystal ball predictions on how things might change:

Behaviour:

  • Multitasking whilst watching the box is more strenuous so people will watch less TV and go to bed earlier.
  • The mobile will become the new remote control. Viewers will turn to their mobile instead of changing the channel.
  • People won’t enjoy watching TV channels as much as they aren’t as engaged.
TV Production
  • TV networks will be forced to interact with viewers. Hashtags are just the beginning – there will be more polls, more ‘let the audience decide’. Choose your own adventure won’t just be the books you read in the primary school library, it will be its own TV subgenre.
  • TV channels will focus more on live entertainment – more live sport, variety shows and live dramas (essentially – theatre) – everything will need to be live to give TV a unique selling point.
  • Content will become shorter. That means The 7.30 report will end at 7.45 and True Blood will go for 27.5 minutes.
  • Sports broadcasting will be supported by mobile experiences where viewers can view game related content and information. Watch the entire game from seat FF 66 in the Great Northern Stand on your iPad.

TV Advertising

  • TV Ads will need to try harder to get our attention.
  • To engage TV Ads will need to incentivise and engage viewing. Live competitions, more yelling of the words FREE, BOGOF, SEX and SALE (not in that order), Google + hangout broadcasts….hmmm.. TV advertising will struggle.
  • More branded content. Red Bull won’t just sponsor teenagers with mullets who ride motorbikes.
  • Mobile User Experience (MUX) will be the next boom for smart digital gurus.
What do you think? Do you find yourself on your phone during intense and complex dramas like Damages and Dexter? Does the mobile detract or enhance TV viewing? Are any of these predictions going to come true?
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 482 other followers